Fabris Rapier and Dagger Sequence (1606)
This sequence is built from techniques in Salvator Fabris'
rapier manual, De lo Schermo, overo Scienza d'Arme (Of Fencing, On the Science
of Arms), which was published in Italian in 1606. His principles were considered
fundamental to the rapier's use through the end of the 17th century.
|

|
Black (on the right) and Red (on the left) face one
another holding their rapiers in terza (with true edges facing the floor).
Fabris recommends postures similar to the ones adopted here because, he
argues, they protect the body by keeping it far from the opponent's weapon while
permitting easy defense of the head. |
|

|
Red creates an opening by lowering his dagger and
drawing it in toward his rapier. Black responds to the invitation by stepping
forward and thrusting above Red's dagger with his rapier in seconda (with hand
pronated and true edge facing to his own right). |
|

|
Red parries Black's attack with his dagger, lunging
forward and to the right, and thrusts against Black's right shoulder with his
rapier in quarta (with hand supinated and true edge facing to his own left).
|
|

|
Black parries Red's attack with his dagger, taking a
compass pace to the right (by swinging his left foot across behind his right),
and thrusts below Red's dagger in terza against his chest. |
|

|
Red parries with his dagger, taking a small compass
pace to the right, and lunges against Black's left shoulder in prima (with hand pronated and false edge facing the floor).
|
|

|
Black parries with his dagger, stepping right, and
cuts man diritto sgualembrato (forehand diagonally descending) against Red's
head. |
|

|
Red parries with rapier (in quarta) and dagger
together, taking a small compass pace to his right. |
|

|
Red holds Black's rapier with his dagger and thrusts
in opposition (sliding his rapier against Black's) to Black's right breast in
quarta. (In the video clip, Black has lowered his left hand to provide an
unobstructed view of this attack.) |
The following techniques from Fabris' manual were used to
construct this sequence:
Plate 73, p. 136 (1-3).
The next quarta hits against an opponent in seconda who has
himself meant to hit over the dagger. Both were in terza; you have made an
opening by slightly lowering the dagger arm and approaching it to your sword;
the adversary seeing the opening has turned from terza to seconda, disengaging
his point, and has thrust over the dagger. You, who have given that opportunity
in order to entice him to that side, have parried and carried the right side so
far forward that you have not only hit, but also assisted the defense by
avoiding with your body; your left side has been carried out of line at the
moment of yor hitting. Further the change of the hand to quarta has brought your
sword away from his dagger. Whilst the adversary was advancing without union
between the weapons, your sword has penetrated with the forte before his dagger
could find it; and thus you have made the hit. Or it may be that the adversary's
sword was on the inside, and you have tried to find it with your dagger, in
order to force a disengage; he has disengaged and seized the time to make a
thrust of seconda above; you have parried and hit with a counter-time as shown.
Plate 73.
Plate 75, p. 138 (4-6).
The next plate shows a hit in quarta made close to the
adversary's arm between his weapons, but low against a terza intended to hit
over the dagger. Both combatants were in terza; you have made a feint of hitting
in terza against your adversary's right shoulder; he has parried with the dagger
and entered with the right foot in order to hit in terza in that time under the
feint; at the same moment you have changed from terza to quarta, and by simply
dropping your point have hit under his dagger hand, which has passed in vain;
for when he tried to parry your point, it had already dropped. You have also
turned the point of your dagger downwards and parried his sword, whilst your
body has been carried out of line in the extension. The arm has remained high,
showing that, although you parry below, you should not drop the arm because the
time would be long and would cause danger above. It may happen that you have
found yourself with your point over the adversary's dagger and in quarta, and
have disengaged over his dagger with a feint of hitting his right shoulder; he
has parried with his dagger and turned in terza, thus dividing his weapons and
leaving an opening between his two hands, so that by simply dropping your point
you have hit the part uncovered. Plate 75.
Plate 76, p. 139 (4-6).
Now is shown a hit with a guard of prima, made in defending
yourself from a cut directed at the head with a parry in the form of a cross,
that is to say with the sword and dagger joined together. Your adversary was in
a guard of prima or seconda; you have tried to engage his sword on the outside
with a guard of terza; the adversary has seized that time and tried to hit with
a cut of mandritto at the head, while you were trying to engage his sword. You,
being in terza, have brought the hilt of your sword and your dagger together
[sic], raised your hands in a cross, and parried with complete protection; in
the same time you have thrust the point of your sword towards your adversary's
chest over the hilt of his sword, lunged and thus hit with a guard of prima;
your adversary's sword is excluded between your sword and dagger in such a way
that he can free it only with difficulty. This manner of defense is very strong;
there is no danger of your weapons being disordered by the shock of the
adversary's sword, however great its impetus; moreover the head is completely
defended on both sides at once. Since the lunge is short, you must advance the
feet and pass, in order to reach the adversary before he can free his sword. One
may say that it is a perfect guard. Plate 76.
Plate 80, p. 143 (6-7).
Now follows a defense in quarta accompanied by the dagger
against a cut of mandritto at the head. The quarta is directed between the
adversary's weapons. He was in a guard of seconda and you have tried to engage
in terza on the outside and with your dagger in union to exclude his sword. The
adversary has seized the time and made his cut at the head, thinking he could
hit the part uncovered. With your weapons in conjunction you havae simply
changed your hands from terza to quarta and parried with the edge of the dagger
which is gernerally below; for in this way, as we have already said, the defense
is strong, the adversary's sword kept further away, and the hands more united;
you have also brought the forte of your sword into that line, which not only
defends and makes the parry safer, but also covers the part below the dagger, so
that, if your adversary had made a feint of cutting at the head and changed to
seconda in order to hit the left side, while you were raising your dagger to
parry, the forte of your sword in this position would still have defended your
left side. In addition to these two good results you would also have hit in the
same time for your adversary could not have parried without abandoning his plan
and changing to seconda; this would have changed the front of his body, so that
he could have defended himself, but could not have hit, since you would have
covered all that line. Plate 80.
Salvator Fabris. De lo Schermo, overo Scienza d'Arme.
Copenhagen: 1606. A.F. Johnson, trans. (n.d.). Joshua Pendragon, ed. (n.d.)
|